From 1 - 5 / 5
  • 'Biotic habitat' classes derived from statistical classification of benthic fauna and substrate data across Chatham Rise and Challenger Plateau. Data collection occurred in 2007.

  • During 2006 and 2007, an ambitious project to quantify and characterise seabed habitats to depths of 1500 m on the Chatham Rise and the Challenger Plateau was carried out through a series of voyages, and subsequent analyses under the auspices of Ocean Survey 20/20, a long-term government programme to map the Exclusive Economic Zone. This report details the findings of Objective 10 which aimed to determine the biotic habitats on the seabed across the Challenger Plateau and Chatham Rise, assess their importance to ecosystem function, production, and sensitivity to disturbance. Available methods for determining the sensitivity of biotic habitats, biodiversity and benthic communities to physical disturbance of the seafloor were assessed, and overall patterns of sensitivity across the two locations described using 3 methods. Biotic habitats represent groups of taxa that occur at one or more sites. A number of taxa or a single taxon can define a biotic habitat. Sites within a biotic habitat may have faunal communities that are very similar to one another, or they may be quite different, making variable community composition a diagnostic of that biotic habitat. The 19 biological groups identified across sampling transects in the Chatham-Challenger project were confirmed as spatially contiguous biotic habitats, associated with specific environmental factors or found in specific locations. Of the 19 groups, nine formed major biotic habitats; one of which was unique to the Challenger Plateau and four unique to the Chatham Rise. The remaining ten groups formed minor biotic habitats, six of which were also unique to the Chatham Rise and one was unique to the Challenger Plateau. Biotic habitats are often associated with certain environmental characteristics (e.g., depth, slope) that make extended mapping possible through the use of these as surrogate variables. Here we were able to use depth, roughness, tidal currents and sea surface productivity as surrogate variables to produce maps of the biotic habitats across both the Challenger Plateau and Chatham Rise. Importantly, habitats are defined as covering scales of interest to a particular study or management objective, and in this case are broad-scale biotic habitats covering 10s – 100s of kilometres. The three methods used to define the sensitivity of benthic communities and biotic habitats differed in the way sensitivity was calculated: (1) the characterising and dominant taxa of a biotic habitat; (2) the abundance of all taxa at a site; or (3) the richness of all taxa at a site. The first of these methods is not recommended for use as it exhibited a low range of values. Methods 2 and 3 both showed wide ranges of values across both the Challenger Plateau and the Chatham Rise. They also produced low values where fishing intensity was high, as would be expected if sensitive species had been removed. Both these methods are likely to be useful as management tools for human-mediated physical disturbances such as bottom fishing.

  • Categories    

    The proposed new mooring areas in Mapua were sampled using a combination of sonar side-scan, dredges, and remote video camera.

  • Categories      

    NIWA was commissioned to survey the six spat sites and the surrounding area of Marine Farms in Wainui, Golden Bay, to assess the ecological effects of the existing farms. Although record in 2007, hydrodynamic modelling was not undertaken in this survey. The rationale for this was previous modelling, assuming full production mussel farms, showed only minor effects on phytoplankton filtration and benthic deposition. The effects of spat farms producing very small mussels up to 15 mm in length before being removed, would be significantly less, and unlikely to be measurable within natural seasonal variability. The methodology and results of the previous hydrodynamic modelling are summarised in this report, however, for the sake of completeness.

  • Categories      

    Seabed sampling of the nearshore region of the STB was conducted during a 3-day field survey undertaken from the 28th February to the 2nd March 2013. Seabed habitats were characterised at 36 sites (26 nearshore sites and 10 cross-shelf sites), using underwater video footage and still images (photo-quadrats). Representative habitats were then sampled using a benthic grab for surficial sediments and a benthic dredge to collect surficial macrobenthic specimens. Ninety-two percent of the seabed along the nearshore region of the STB was characterised by extensive soft-sediments that supported few macrobenthic organisms. The remaining 8% of the seabed (five sites) comprised hard substratum in the form of either low to moderate relief hard rock (6%) or variable relief mudstone (2%) outcrops. In contrast to mudstone outcrops, which supported low or negligible amounts of macrobenthos, hard rock outcrops supported abundant and diverse assemblages, with the two dredges sampled at Site 5 and 6 accounting for more than 25% of all specimens and 61% of all species collected during the survey.